Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1265

reference
1000-tree-1
name
1265
tree-preservation-order

undefined

1000-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.029659 50.874188)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.029602 50.874182,-1.029604 50.874194,-1.029612 50.874204,-1.029625 50.874212,-1.029640 50.874217,-1.029658 50.874219,-1.029676 50.874217,-1.029692 50.874212,-1.029704 50.874204,-1.029713 50.874194,-1.029716 50.874183,-1.029713 50.874172,-1.029705 50.874162,-1.029693 50.874154,-1.029677 50.874149,-1.029659 50.874147,-1.029642 50.874149,-1.029626 50.874154,-1.029613 50.874161,-1.029605 50.874171,-1.029602 50.874182)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL